The Anti-Torture Act: US Law Against Torture at Home and Abroad
The United States Anti-Torture Act (18 U.S.C. § 2340A) implements the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT) and makes it a federal crime for U.S. nationals or persons present in the United States to commit torture outside U.S. territory. The Convention Against Torture (1984) creates an absolute, non-derogable prohibition on torture — no exceptional circumstances, including war or national emergency, can justify it. Despite these clear statutory and treaty prohibitions, the CIA's post-9/11 'enhanced interrogation' program tested whether the executive branch could define its way around the absolute prohibition.
Primary Text
CAT Art. 1; 18 U.S.C. § 2340“Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life. (18 U.S.C. § 2340A(a))”
What It Means
The UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1984 and entered into force in 1987. The United States ratified it in 1994. The Convention defines torture as intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering by a public official for purposes including obtaining information, punishment, intimidation, or discrimination. Article 2 makes the prohibition absolute: 'No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.' The Convention also prohibits refoulement — returning a person to a country where they face a serious risk of torture.
The implementing statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2340A, creates federal criminal jurisdiction over torture committed outside U.S. territory — meaning a U.S. official who tortures someone in a foreign country can be prosecuted in U.S. courts. The statute defines 'severe mental pain or suffering' to include prolonged mental harm resulting from threats of death, use of mind-altering substances, and threats against third parties. In a development that shocked legal scholars, the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel issued memos in 2002 (the 'Torture Memos') arguing that techniques like waterboarding did not meet the statutory definition of 'severe' suffering — an interpretation widely rejected as legally deficient and subsequently withdrawn.
The post-9/11 CIA detention and interrogation program documented in the Senate Intelligence Committee's 2014 report ('SSCI Report') included waterboarding, sleep deprivation lasting up to 180 hours, confinement in small boxes, rectal feeding, and mock executions. The Senate report concluded these techniques produced little actionable intelligence and were more brutal than the CIA had represented to oversight bodies. No CIA official was criminally prosecuted under the Anti-Torture Act. The Obama administration declined to prosecute, citing reliance on OLC guidance — setting a precedent that official torture authorized by legal memos falls outside the statute's reach in practice.
Real-World Application
Abu Zubaydah Waterboarding (2002–2007): Abu Zubaydah, the first high-value detainee held by the CIA, was waterboarded 83 times. He was held in CIA black sites in multiple countries and subsequently transferred to Guantanamo Bay, where he remained as of 2024 — never charged with a crime — because his treatment made prosecution legally and politically untenable. The European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2022 that Poland violated the European Convention on Human Rights by hosting a CIA black site where Zubaydah was tortured. His case remains the starkest illustration of how the Anti-Torture Act and CAT obligations were systematically violated without domestic criminal accountability.
Related Laws
Stay Ahead of the Law
Pro members get weekly briefings on new laws, executive orders, and international legal developments — decoded in plain English, no spin.
Join Pro — Weekly Briefs