Know the rules of the game.
International and domestic law, decoded into plain language. The UN Charter, constitutional duties, and live conflicts — mapped, sourced, and searchable.
Weekly Law Brief
One sharp brief every week. The law, the source, the stakes.
Pro members get the week's most important legal development broken down into plain language, tied back to the actual text, and posted with the source trail intact.
Community Access
Get into member discussion threads organized by law, clause, and conflict instead of scrolling for context.
Immediate Unlock
Join now and start with member-only deep dives, case files, and the full Pro archive on day one.
Built for citizens. Sourced from primary documents.
What every member can count on
KnowTheGame is new — so instead of testimonials, here's what we promise to hold ourselves to.
Always sourced
Every claim links to a primary source — the UN Charter, constitutional text, or public record. No unattributed takes.
Independent
Not affiliated with any government, party, or agency. We map the law as written, not as it's spun.
Plain language
Dense legal text translated into something you can actually use, cite, and explain to someone else.
The law, mapped end to end
The supreme international law
Article 2(4) prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state. Article 51 preserves the inherent right to self-defense only when an armed attack occurs. We break down every cornerstone provision with context.
Article 2(4)
UN Charter Art. 2(4)
Refrain from the threat or use of force. Aggression is a violation.
Article 51
UN Charter Art. 51
Self-defense only — not preemptive empire-building.
U.S. Const. Art. II §3 · Art. I §9 cl. 8
Constitutional obligations
Take Care Clause, Article II, and the Emoluments Clause — decoded. No selective enforcement, no hidden conflicts.
Conflicts vs. the law
Current events measured against the rules, with searchable articles and clauses at your fingertips.
CBS News · AP
Sen. Lindsey Graham dies at 71
CBS News and AP are reporting that Sen. Lindsey Graham died at 71 after a brief and sudden illness, with no further cause released.
111
UN Charter articles
1945
The order it founded
100%
Primary-source backed
PRIMARY SOURCES — Read the Original Documents
Declassified memos. Ignored UN speeches. The documents history tried to bury.
Malcolm X — “The Ballot or the Bullet”
Malcolm X turned a speech into a jurisdiction fight: stop begging the United States to solve a domestic civil-rights problem it created, and bring the case to the world as a human-rights indictment under the UN Charter.
Read the Document FBI Declassified · 1956–1971COINTELPRO FBI Memos (1956–1971)
The FBI sent MLK an anonymous suicide letter. Church Committee confirmed it in 1975.
Read the Document London Convention · 1946–1993Nuclear Waste Ocean Dumping (1946–1993)
14 nations legally dumped radioactive waste in the ocean for 47 years. The 1993 ban wasn't retroactive. 200,000+ containers remain on the ocean floor. Zero prosecutions.
Read the Document Courtroom Defense · 1953“History Will Absolve Me” (1953)
Castro defended himself at 27 before a military tribunal — citing Cuba's own constitution. The speech was smuggled out of prison in matchboxes. Translated into 27 languages.
Read the Document🔍 Fun Fact for the Day
Did you know? The United States has formal diplomatic relations with 195 countries but maintains no embassy in 2 of them.
Source: CIA World Factbook — United States
FOREIGN POLICY: WHERE THE LAW GETS BENT
War Powers, Sanctions, Treaties, Intelligence — the legal architecture of American power abroad.
WAR POWERS RESOLUTION (1973)
50 U.S.C. § 1541–1548
"The President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces... unless the Congress has declared war or enacted specific authorization."
Sets a 60-day clock on unauthorized military deployments. If Congress doesn't approve within 60 days (90 days to withdraw), the deployment must end. Presidents have routinely reported compliance "for consistency" while denying it applies to them.
Real-world now
Ongoing AUMF-justified operations in Syria and Iraq. As of 2026, US forces remain deployed under authorizations passed over 20 years ago — never reviewed under the 60-day clock.
AUMF 2001
Pub. L. 107-40 (2001)
"The President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."
Authorization for Use of Military Force passed three days after 9/11. Still active. Has been used to justify operations in 80+ countries. Legal critics argue it has been stretched far beyond its original scope — a blank check for perpetual war.
Real-world now
Used to justify strikes in Somalia, Yemen, Niger, Syria, and elsewhere — countries with no connection to the 9/11 attacks. No sunset clause. No geographic limit.
AUMF 2002 (IRAQ)
Pub. L. 107-243 (2002)
"The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to... defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq."
Authorized the 2003 Iraq invasion. Technically still on the books despite the Iraq war ending in 2011. Senate voted to repeal it in 2024 — the House never acted. An active AUMF for a war that's been over for 15 years.
Real-world now
As of 2026, AUMF 2002 remains unrepealed in the House. Legal scholars warn it could still be cited to justify new military action in or near Iraq.
IEEPA
50 U.S.C. § 1701–1707
"The President may... regulate or prohibit... any transaction in foreign exchange... by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."
International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Gives the President sweeping unilateral authority to regulate international commerce during a declared national emergency — without congressional approval. Used to impose tariffs, sanctions, and asset freezes.
Real-world now
IEEPA invoked to impose tariffs on allies and adversaries alike. Trump used it in 2025–2026 to impose broad tariffs, bypassing the normal congressional trade process. Courts are still ruling on the limits of this authority.
OFAC SANCTIONS LAW
50 U.S.C. § 1701; 31 C.F.R. Ch. V
"Civil penalties up to $1,000,000 per violation. Criminal penalties up to $1,000,000 and 20 years imprisonment."
Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control administers and enforces US economic and trade sanctions. Violations carry severe civil and criminal penalties. Applies to all US persons globally — including companies and individuals overseas.
Real-world now
OFAC's SDN (Specially Designated Nationals) list has over 12,000 entries. Banks, crypto exchanges, and multinationals face massive fines for processing transactions that touch sanctioned entities — even unknowingly.
TREATY CLAUSE (ARTICLE II §2)
U.S. Const. Art. II §2 cl. 2
"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur."
The President negotiates treaties, but 2/3 of the Senate must ratify them for them to have the force of law. To avoid this supermajority requirement, Presidents increasingly use 'executive agreements' — which can be undone by the next President with a phone call.
Real-world now
The Iran JCPOA (2015) was deliberately structured as an executive agreement, not a treaty, to avoid the Senate ratification requirement. Trump withdrew by executive action in 2018 with no congressional vote.
VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS
VCCR (1963) Art. 36
"The competent authorities of the receiving State shall, without delay, inform the consular post... if, within its consular district, a national of that State is arrested."
Requires immediate notification when a foreign national is arrested — so their home country's consulate can offer assistance. The US routinely fails to comply. The ICJ has ruled against the US in multiple high-profile cases, including Avena (Mexico v. US, 2004).
Real-world now
As of 2026, several foreign nationals on US death row were arrested and tried without consular notification. The Supreme Court has ruled that states are not required to implement ICJ judgments — leaving an ongoing US violation in place.
LOGAN ACT (1799)
18 U.S.C. § 953
"Any citizen of the United States... who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government... with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government... shall be fined or imprisoned."
Prohibits private US citizens from conducting unauthorized negotiations with foreign governments. Rarely prosecuted — only two indictments in 225 years. But frequently cited when incoming administrations or private actors make back-channel foreign policy contacts before taking office.
Real-world now
The Logan Act was cited in 2017 during the investigation of Michael Flynn's calls with Russian Ambassador Kislyak before Trump's inauguration. No charges were ultimately brought under the Act itself.
NATIONAL SECURITY ACT (1947)
50 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
"The term 'covert action' means an activity or activities of the United States Government to influence political, economic, or military conditions abroad, where it is intended that the role of the United States Government will not be apparent."
Created the CIA, the NSC, and the framework for covert operations. Requires a signed Presidential Finding before any covert action can be undertaken. Congress must be notified — at minimum, the Gang of Eight. No Finding = no legal authority.
Real-world now
Every major CIA covert operation since 1947 — from Iran 1953 to present-day cyber operations — legally requires a Presidential Finding. The Findings themselves are classified but their existence is legally mandated.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333
Exec. Order No. 12,333 (1981)
"The CIA may collect... foreign intelligence or counterintelligence abroad... The CIA shall not collect intelligence on United States persons within the United States."
The primary legal authority governing the Intelligence Community outside the US. Permits broad collection on foreign persons abroad. Critics warn that incidental collection of US person data under 12333 faces minimal oversight compared to data collected under FISA — creating a legal backdoor.
Real-world now
NSA programs revealed by Snowden in 2013 operated largely under EO 12333. Because the data is collected abroad on 'foreign targets,' US person data swept up incidentally is subject to far weaker minimization procedures than domestic collection.
NUCLEAR WASTE OCEANIC DUMP SITES
From 1946 to 1993, nations dumped an estimated 200,000+ containers of radioactive waste into the world’s oceans. The London Convention banned the practice — but accountability never followed.
200,000+
Containers dumped globally
1946–1993
Active dumping era
14+
Nations involved
0
Criminal prosecutions
How it happened
After World War II, the United States, United Kingdom, Soviet Union, and a dozen European nations faced a growing stockpile of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste with no viable disposal infrastructure. The ocean was treated as a permanent, self-diluting dump. The US Atomic Energy Commission and its European counterparts authorized ocean dumping as standard practice from 1946 onward.
Waste was packed into steel drums — often lined with concrete — and dropped from ships into designated zones. The AEC’s own reports documented drum failures at depths. Independent surveys beginning in the 1970s confirmed widespread container corrosion and radioactive leaching at multiple sites.
London Convention & Protocol
LONDON CONVENTION (1972)
Created the first global framework restricting ocean dumping. Established a permit system for waste disposal at sea. Did not immediately ban radioactive waste — it created an “annex” system distinguishing “black listed” (prohibited) and “grey listed” (regulated) substances.
1993 AMENDMENT
After years of advocacy by Greenpeace and Pacific Island nations, the Convention parties voted to ban all radioactive waste dumping. The ban took legal effect in 1994 — prohibiting even low-level dumping that had previously been permitted.
LONDON PROTOCOL (1996)
Replaced permissive “black list” logic with a precautionary “reverse list” approach: everything is prohibited unless specifically permitted. The Protocol entered into force in 2006 and represents the current binding standard under international law.
International Legal Framework
UNCLOS
UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982)
Article 194 requires states to take all measures necessary to prevent, reduce, and control pollution of the marine environment. Article 210 specifically addresses dumping — requiring national laws “no less effective” than global rules.
View UNCLOS law page →LONDON CONVENTION
Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution (1972)
87 parties. Established the global legal framework. The 1993 amendment banning radioactive dumping was adopted by consensus vote and is binding on all parties. Enforcement responsibility falls on flag states — the country whose ship performed the dump.
LONDON PROTOCOL
1996 Protocol to the London Convention
Supersedes the London Convention for its 53 parties. Applies the precautionary principle: the burden of proof is reversed — dumpers must prove safety, not regulators prove harm. Prohibits all sea disposal of radioactive materials with no permit exceptions.
Known Dump Sites
NORTHEAST ATLANTIC
Beaufort's Dyke & Bay of Biscay
The primary disposal zone used by the UK, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Beaufort's Dyke — a deep trench between Scotland and Northern Ireland — received an estimated 100,000+ tonnes of munitions and radioactive waste. The Bay of Biscay received over 140,000 containers of low-level radioactive waste from European nations between 1949 and 1982.
Legal Status
Banned under 1993 London Convention amendment
FARALLON ISLANDS
Pacific — off San Francisco, USA
Between 1946 and 1970, the United States dumped an estimated 47,500 containers of radioactive waste into the ocean 50 miles off the California coast. The site, now part of the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, sits in an active earthquake zone. The containers were 55-gallon drums — many corroded and leaking. The Navy's own surveys documented multiple drum failures.
Legal Status
Grandfathered pre-London Convention; now prohibited
MARSHALL ISLANDS / PACIFIC
Trust Territory operations — US Pacific Proving Grounds
Operation Crossroads (1946) and subsequent nuclear tests at Bikini and Enewetak Atolls contaminated the surrounding Pacific with radioactive debris, ships, and dumped materials. The US conducted 67 nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands, displacing populations and rendering islands uninhabitable. Contamination has persisted for 80 years. The Runit Dome — a concrete cap over nuclear waste — is deteriorating and leaching into the Pacific.
Legal Status
US trust territory legacy; no criminal accountability applied
ARCTIC — SOVIET / RUSSIAN SITES
Kara Sea & Barents Sea
The Soviet Union — and Russia after the USSR's dissolution — dumped reactors, reactor fuel, and entire nuclear submarines in the Kara Sea and surrounding Arctic waters. At least 16 nuclear reactors, including some still containing spent nuclear fuel, were dumped between 1965 and 1988. The IAEA confirmed in 1993 that dumping included liquid and solid nuclear waste. Russia disclosed many of these sites only after the Soviet collapse.
Legal Status
Violations of multiple international agreements; limited enforcement
Major Dump Sites — At a Glance
| Region | Country | Est. Volume | Years Active | Legal Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast Atlantic | UK, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland | ~140,000 containers | 1949–1982 | Banned (1993) |
| Farallon Islands (Pacific) | United States | ~47,500 containers | 1946–1970 | Pre-ban; now prohibited |
| Marshall Islands / Pacific Proving Grounds | United States | 67 nuclear tests + debris | 1946–1958 | Trust territory; no accountability |
| Kara Sea / Barents Sea (Arctic) | USSR / Russia | 16+ reactors; liquid & solid waste | 1965–1988 | Violated treaties; not prosecuted |
| Pacific (general US operations) | United States | ~107,000 containers total (US est.) | 1946–1970 | Banned under London Convention |
Who Is Accountable — and Why They Aren’t
Flag State Enforcement
Under UNCLOS Art. 217 and the London Convention, flag states — the countries whose ships performed dumping — bear primary enforcement responsibility. No flag state has ever been criminally prosecuted for historic radioactive ocean dumping.
IAEA Monitoring
The International Atomic Energy Agency has assessed multiple dump sites. Their 1999 review of the Northeast Atlantic concluded contamination was “not significant at present.” Critics argue the methodology underestimates long-term container degradation and seabed migration of radionuclides.
Domestic Accountability
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and EPA have jurisdiction over domestic actors. Congress has funded surveys but no remediation. The Runit Dome in the Marshall Islands — a US responsibility under COFA treaty obligations — is deteriorating with no funded containment plan as of 2026.
The Bottom Line
The London Convention and Protocol establish clear international law. UNCLOS codifies the duty to protect the marine environment. The gap is not legal — it is political. Historic dumping nations have the most to answer for and the most institutional power to block accountability mechanisms. No treaty-based court has jurisdiction to compel remediation. The International Court of Justice can adjudicate disputes between states, but no state has formally brought a dumping case. This is international law working exactly as powerful states designed it.
Search the law map
UN Charter articles, US constitutional clauses, and international law concepts — plain language, sourced.
A public armed with the law is unstoppable.
Join KnowTheGame Pro for the weekly law brief, the member community, and immediate access to the archive. Read the rules, cite them, hold power to them.